Rankings β†’ Will AI Replace…

Will AI Replace Shampooers?

62/100 β€” High Risk
SOC 39-5093

πŸ’‘ Shampooers have a composite risk score of 62/100 (Frey-Osborne probability: 79%, GenAI exposure: 53/100). With 8,890 workers in the US, this is one of the most AI-vulnerable occupations. Full occupation profile β†’

🎯 The Verdict

Likely for many tasks. The role will look very different in 5–10 years.

With 8,890 workers and a median wage of $31K,shampooers represent a significant portion of the US workforce. Their GenAI exposure index is 53%, meaning a majority of their core tasks overlap with current generative AI capabilities.

Risk Score

62/100

Employment

8,890

Median Wage

$31K

GenAI Exposure

53%

⚠️ Top Risk Factors

1.

AI fitness coaching apps displacing personal trainers

2.

AI-powered skincare and beauty recommendation apps

3.

Automated booking and client management platforms

4.

Virtual try-on technology reducing in-person consultations

πŸ›‘οΈ Tasks AI Can't Easily Replace

βœ“

Emotional support and active listening during sessions

βœ“

Creative aesthetic judgment for individual clients

βœ“

Adapting techniques to individual body types and preferences

πŸ”„ Career Transition Paths

Related occupations with lower AI risk and high skills overlap:

Tour and Travel Guides

70% skills overlap Β· $37K median wage

27/100

Concierges

81% skills overlap Β· $37K median wage

29/100

Social Workers, All Other

65% skills overlap Β· $69K median wage

22/100

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Will AI completely replace shampooers?

Likely for many tasks. The role will look very different in 5–10 years.

What is the AI risk score for shampooers?

Shampooers have a composite AI automation risk score of 62 out of 100, classified as "High Risk".

How many shampooers are there in the US?

There are approximately 8,890 shampooers employed in the United States.

What do shampooers earn?

The median annual wage for shampooers is $31K.

What skills should shampooers develop?

Focus on tasks AI can't easily replicate: emotional support and active listening during sessions, creative aesthetic judgment for individual clients, adapting techniques to individual body types and preferences. These human-centric skills will become more valuable as routine tasks are automated.