SOC 19-1032
Foresters
Risk Score
⚠️32/100
Moderate
US Employment
👥9,650
Total workers
Median Wage
💰$71K
$49K – $103K
Projected Growth
📈+1.2%
2023-2033 (BLS)
GenAI Exposure
🤖67/100
High exposure
💡 Foresters face a risk score of 32/100 — 12 points below the national average of 44. With 67/100 GenAI exposure, this occupation faces significant pressure from AI tools despite strong projected growth. See our methodology →
💡 Workers in this field earn $71K ($24K above the national median). The 3 recommended career transitions all maintain competitive wages while reducing automation exposure. Explore transition paths →
🔍 AI Impact Analysis
With a risk score of 32/100, Foresters faces moderate automation pressure. While tasks like ai literature review and meta-analysis automation are increasingly handled by AI, the role retains significant human elements. The 9,650 workers in this occupation should focus on strengthening skills in designing novel experiments and research methodologies and interpreting ambiguous results with domain expertise to stay ahead. The role will likely evolve rather than disappear.
Will AI Replace Foresters?
Read our full analysis with verdict, risk factors, safe tasks, and career transition paths →
⚠️ Top Risk Factors
AI literature review and meta-analysis automation
AI-powered research and literature review tools
AI coding assistants reducing developer demand
🛡️ Tasks Safe from Automation
Designing novel experiments and research methodologies
Interpreting ambiguous results with domain expertise
Collaborative scientific discourse and peer review
Ethical oversight of research involving human subjects
📊 vs National Average
National avg: $46K
National avg: 44/100
National avg: 38/100
National avg: 3.7%
🔄 Career Transition Paths
| Occupation | Risk | Wage | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Scientists and Related Workers | 21 | $93K | 82% |
| Political Scientists | 25 | $139K | 74% |
| Occupational Health and Safety Specialists and Technicians | 26 | $79K | 72% |