SOC 19-1000
Life Scientists
Risk Score
⚠️32/100
Moderate
US Employment
👥374,670
Total workers
Median Wage
💰$91K
$54K – $164K
Projected Growth
📈+5.9%
2023-2033 (BLS)
GenAI Exposure
🤖35/100
Moderate exposure
💡 Life Scientists face a risk score of 32/100 — 12 points below the national average of 44. With only 35/100 GenAI exposure, most core tasks remain resistant to current AI capabilities. See our methodology →
💡 Workers in this field earn $91K ($44K above the national median). The 3 recommended career transitions all maintain competitive wages while reducing automation exposure. Explore transition paths →
🔍 AI Impact Analysis
With a risk score of 32/100, Life Scientists faces moderate automation pressure. While tasks like ai-accelerated data analysis and pattern recognition are increasingly handled by AI, the role retains significant human elements. The 374,670 workers in this occupation should focus on strengthening skills in designing novel experiments and research methodologies and interpreting ambiguous results with domain expertise to stay ahead. The role will likely evolve rather than disappear.
Will AI Replace Life Scientists?
Read our full analysis with verdict, risk factors, safe tasks, and career transition paths →
⚠️ Top Risk Factors
AI-accelerated data analysis and pattern recognition
Automated laboratory instrumentation and workflows
Machine learning models replacing manual hypothesis testing
🛡️ Tasks Safe from Automation
Designing novel experiments and research methodologies
Interpreting ambiguous results with domain expertise
Fieldwork in unstructured natural environments
Collaborative scientific discourse and peer review
📊 vs National Average
National avg: $46K
National avg: 44/100
National avg: 38/100
National avg: 3.7%
🔄 Career Transition Paths
| Occupation | Risk | Wage | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dentists, All Other Specialists | 13 | $226K | 63% |
| Social Scientists and Related Workers | 21 | $93K | 82% |
| Political Scientists | 25 | $139K | 74% |